Closing the AI Knowledge Gap

نویسندگان

  • Ziv Epstein
  • Blakeley H. Payne
  • Judy Hanwen Shen
  • Abhimanyu Dubey
  • Bjarke Felbo
  • Matthew Groh
  • Nick Obradovich
  • Manuel Cebrian
  • Iyad Rahwan
چکیده

AI researchers employ not only the scientific method, but also methodology from mathematics and engineering. However, the use of the scientific method – specifically hypothesis testing – in AI is typically conducted in service of engineering objectives. Growing interest in topics such as fairness and algorithmic bias show that engineering-focused questions only comprise a subset of the important questions about AI systems. This results in the AI Knowledge Gap: the number of unique AI systems grows faster than the number of studies that characterize these systems’ behavior. To close this gap, we argue that the study of AI could benefit from the greater inclusion of researchers who are well positioned to formulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of AI systems. We examine the barriers preventing social and behavioral scientists from conducting such studies. Our diagnosis suggests that accelerating the scientific study of AI systems requires new incentives for academia and industry, mediated by new tools and institutions. To address these needs, we propose a two-sided marketplace called TuringBox. On one side, AI contributors upload existing and novel algorithms to be studied scientifically by others. On the other side, AI examiners develop and post machine intelligence tasks designed to evaluate and characterize algorithmic behavior. We discuss this market’s potential to democratize the scientific study of AI behavior, and thus narrow the AI Knowledge Gap. 1 The Many Facets of AI Research Although AI is a sub-discipline of computer science, AI researchers do not exclusively use the scientific method in their work. For example, the methods used by early AI researchers often drew from logic, a subfield of mathematics, and are distinct from the scientific method we think of today. Indeed AI has adopted many techniques and approaches over time. In this section, we distinguish and explore the history of these ∗Equal contribution. methodologies with a particular emphasis on characterizing the evolving science of AI.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

From Knowing to Doing—From the Academy to Practice; Comment on “The Many Meanings of Evidence: Implications for the Translational Science Agenda in Healthcare”

In this commentary, the idea of closing the gap between knowing and doing through closing the gap between academics and practitioners is explored. The two communities approach to knowledge production and use, has predominated within healthcare, resulting in a separation between the worlds of research and practice, and, therefore, between its producers and users. Meaningful collaborations betwee...

متن کامل

CORRIGENDUM: Topological Phase Transition without Gap Closing

This Article contains typographical errors in the Results and Discussion sections, where ‘‘A’’ should read ‘‘AI’’. In the Results section: ‘‘(BDI R A R BDI)’’ should read ‘‘(BDI R AI R BDI)’’ In the Discussion section: ‘‘BDI R A’’ should read ‘‘BDI R AI’’ ‘‘(BDI R A R BDI)’’ should read ‘‘(BDI R AI R BDI)’’ In addition, the red line between BDI andA should be between BDI andAI. The correct Figu...

متن کامل

Numerical Formulation on Crack Closing Effect In Buckling Analysis of Edge-Cracked Columns

In this paper, buckling of simply supported column with an edge crack is investigated numerically and analytically. Four different scenarios of damage severities are applied to a column, open crack assumption and the effect of closing crack in stability of the column which depends on position and size of cracks, are numerically compared. Crack surfaces contact is modeled with GAP element using ...

متن کامل

Rules as Simple Way to Model Knowledge - Closing the Gap between Promise and Reality

There is a considerable gap between the potential of rules bases to be a simpler way to formulate high level knowledge and the reality of tiresome and error prone rule bases creation processes. Based on the experience from three rule base creation projects this paper identifies reasons for this gap between promise and reality and proposes steps that can be taken to close it. An architecture for...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018